Berkshire, Complete Car Care, Crown Court, guilty of two separate breaches of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974., Health and Safety Executive, Mark Walker, safety at work, Staines-upon-Thames, Vehicle
It is not often we think about cars in the context of work but a recent court case involving the owner of Complete Car Care, a Berkshire based car maintenance business is a stark reminder that cars are a risk that needs pragmatic managing or face tragic circumstances.
Mark Walker (sole company owner) was found guilty of two separate breaches of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and sentenced last week for safety failings after reversing into and killing a customer in his van. He was fined £7,500 and ordered to undertake 250 hours of community work. His insurance company also face a bill of £75,000 in prosecution costs,
Frederick Gleeson, 79, from Staines, Surrey, sustained fatal head injuries in the incident at Complete Car Care on Welley Road, Wraysbury, on 12 March 2012. The court found Mr Gleeson was struck by a van driven by Mark Walker after dropping his car at the domestic business to have an oil leak checked.
According to the HSE “Reading Crown Court heard during a week-long trial (10-18 December) that Mr Gleeson was in the driveway of the premises as Mark Walker started to reverse his van along the drive to leave the garage. Mr Gleeson was unable to react in time as the van came towards him and was knocked over, banging his head on the drive. He was rushed to Wrexham Park Hospital but died later the same day from his injuries.
A subsequent investigation by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) identified that Mark Walker had no system in place for safely managing the movement of vehicles, particularly reversing vehicles, in his yard.
The court was told his van had no direct rear visibility, and that a rear monitoring camera that had retrospectively been fitted to the vehicle wasn’t used.
HSE also established that Mark Walker did not physically check whether the route was clear of any person or arrange for assistance when reversing.
Managing the movement of vehicles at his premises was entirely his responsibility and it is clear there was no system in place to control this. Pedestrians and vehicles should always be segregated, and if that cannot happen then other precautions should be put in place.
On this occasion that should, at the very least, have included checking the rear of the van before reversing with assistance if necessary, or putting in place a system that meant he did not have to reverse from his premises, neither of which happened.”
Further information on safely managing workplace transport can be found online at www.hse.gov.uk/workplacetransport
Subscribe to the HSE bulletin here